Image from Google Jackets

Effect of tillage and soil cover on weeds in small holder conservation agricultural system / Otim,Godfrey Anyoni

By: Material type: TextDescription: xviii. 203 pages : illustration ; 30 cmSubject(s):
DDC classification:
  • 23rd. 631.53 OTI
Contents:
Ch 1: Introduction - - 1.0 Introduction - - 1.1 Background of the study - - 1.1.1 Historical and contextual background - - 1.1.2. Small holder farmer - - 1.1.3 Conservation agriculture (ca) and its principles - - 1.1.4. Soil weed seed bank - - 1.1.5 Integrated weed management in conservation agriculture - - 1.2 Statement of the problem - - 1.3 Justification of the study - - 1.4 Objectives of the study - - 1.4.1 Major objective - - 1.4.2 Specific objectives - - 1.5 Research hypothesis - - 1.6 Definition of key terms - - 1.6.1 Conservation agriculture - - 1.6.2 Soil cover - - 1.6.3 Soil seed bank or weed seed bank - - 1.6.4 Minimum tillage (mt) - - 1.6.5 Integrated weed management - - 1.6.6 Ecological weed management - - 1.6.7 Hand weeding - - 1.6.8 Hand hoeing - - 1.6.9 Intercropping - - 1.6.10 Mowing - - 1.6.11 Cutting - - 1.6.12 Dredging and chaining - - 1.7 Conceptual framework - - 1.8. Philosophical under pinning of this research - - Ch 2: Literature review - - 2.0 Introduction - - 2.1 Climate change - - 2.2 Conservation agriculture for sustainability (energy use efficiency and soil health) - - 2.2.1 Relating conservation agriculture with the soil seed bank - - 2.2.2 Crop performance and yield under CA - - 2.2.3 Mechanization of conservation agriculture - - 2.2.4 CA policy and institutional support implications for developing countries - - 2.2.5 Effect of CA on soil health - - 2.2.6. Effect of CA on weeds - - 2.3 Weed ecology - - 2.4 Weed dynamics - - 2.5 Weed management - - 2.5.1 Mechanical and manual weed control - - 2.5.2 Cultural weed control - - 2.5.3 Chemical weed management - - 2.5.4 Preventive weed management - - 2.5.5. Herbicide tolerant crops (HTC) - - 2.5.6 Biological weed control - - 2.6 Integrated weed management in CA - - 2.7. Soil seed banks - - 2.8 Estimation of the soil seed bank - - 2.9.0 Effect of crop management practice on weeds and crop yield - - 2.9.1 Effect of tillage practice on weeds - - 2.9.2 Effect of soil cover on weeds - - 2.9.3 Effect of intercropping on crop yield and performance - - 2.9.4 Yield and weed response to diversified crop rotations - - 2.9.5 Integrated weed management in perspective - - 2.9.6 Conclusion and future prospect of ca for Uganda - - Chapter three: research methodology - - 3.1 objective 1. To compare three seed bank estimation techniques for detecting treatment Differences and determining seed density and species composition - - 3.1.1 Introduction - - 3.1.2 Study site - - 3.1.3 Materials - - 3.1.4 Experimental design and layout - - 3.1.5 Data collection - - 3.1.6 Statistical analysis - - 3.2 Objective 2: to determine the effect of tillage practice on weed density, diversity and Crop performance - - 3.2.1 Materials - - 3.2.2 Methods: experimental design and crop management - - 3.2.3 Data collection - - 3.2.3.1 Weed density - - 3.2.3.2 Weed community - - 3.2.3.3 Leaf area index (lai) and plant height (cm) - - 3.2.3.4 Stand count - - 3.2.3.5 Days to 50% flowering - - 3.2.3.6 plant height - - 3.2.3.7 Pod number - - 3.2.3.8 Pod length - - 3.2.3.9 Disease and pest incidence - - 3.2.3.10 Grain yield - - 3.2.3.11 Rainfall (mm) and daily temperature (OC) - - 3.2.3.12 Data sheet - - 3.2.3.13 Global positioning system receiver (GPS receiver) - - 3.2.14 Statistical analysis - - 3.3 Objective 3: to determine the effect of soil cover on weed density, diversity and crop Performance - - 3.3.1 Materials - - 3.3.2 Methods: experimental design and crop management - - 3.3.3 Data collection - - 3.3.4 Statistical analysis - - 3.4 Objective 4: to determine the effect of the intercrops on overall crop performance in Conservation agricultural systems - - 3.4.1 Materials - - 3.4.2 Methods experimental design and crop management - - 3.4.3 Data collection - - 3.4.4 Data analysis - - 3.5 Ethical consideration - - 3.6 Limitation of the study - - Ch:4 Result Presentations, analysis and discussion of findings - - 4.0 Comparison of three soil seed bank estimation techniques for detecting treatment differences and determining seed density and species composition - - 4.1.1 Introduction - - 4.1.2 Comparison of the three soil seed bank estimation methods to measure soil seed bank weed density - - 4.1.2 Comparison of the three soil seed bank estimation methods to measure weed diversity - - 4.1.3 Effect of tillage and soil cover on soil seed bank - - 4.1.4 Effect of season on soil seed bank density - - 4.1.5 Effect of season on soil seed bank diversity - - 4.1.6 Discussion for the comparison of three soil seed bank estimation techniques for detecting treatment differences and determining soil seed density and diversity - - 4.1.7 Conclusion - - 4.2 Effect of tillage practice on weed density, diversity and crop performance - - 4.2.1 Introduction - - 4.2.2. Effect of rainfall amount and number of rainy days on weed density and diversity - - 4.2.3 Effect of tillage practice on weed density - - 4.2.4 Effect of tillage practice on weed diversity using shannon weiner index - - 4.2.5 Effect of tillage practice on weed diversity using simpsons diversity index - - 4.2.6 Effect of tillage practice on yield - - 4.2.7 Effect of tillage practice x soil cover practice x season interaction on above ground weed density - - 4.2.8 Effect of tillage practice x soil cover practice x season interaction on above ground weed diversity - - 4.2.9 Discussion and conclusion objective 2 - - 4.3 Effect of soil cover practice on weed density, diversity and crop performance - - 4.3.1 Introduction - - 4.3.3 Effect of soil cover practice on above ground weed density - - 4.3.4 Effect of soil cover practice on weed diversity using shannon weiner index - - 4.3.5 Effect of soil cover practice on weed diversity using simpsons diversity index - - 4.3.6 Effect of soil cover practice on yield - - 4.3.7 Discussion objective 3 - - 4.3.8 Conclusion objective 3 - - 4.4 Effect of intercropping on overall crop performance under ca system - - 4.4.1 Introduction - - 4.4.2 Effect of intercropping on maize yield - - 4.4.3 Effect of intercropping on soybean yield - - 4.4.4 Land equivalence ratio (LER) - - 4.4.5 Effect of intercropping on key maize crop growth parameters - - 4.4.6 Discussion - - 4.4.7 Conclusion - - Ch 5: Implication of the study - - Ch 6: Conclusion and recommendation - -
Item type: PHD Dissertations
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Holdings
Current library Call number Status Barcode
Archbishop Kiwanuka Memorial Library 631.53 OTI (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Available 5276

Include bibliographical references

Ch 1: Introduction - -
1.0 Introduction - -
1.1 Background of the study - -
1.1.1 Historical and contextual background - -
1.1.2. Small holder farmer - -
1.1.3 Conservation agriculture (ca) and its principles - -
1.1.4. Soil weed seed bank - -
1.1.5 Integrated weed management in conservation agriculture - -
1.2 Statement of the problem - -
1.3 Justification of the study - -
1.4 Objectives of the study - -
1.4.1 Major objective - -
1.4.2 Specific objectives - -
1.5 Research hypothesis - -
1.6 Definition of key terms - -
1.6.1 Conservation agriculture - -
1.6.2 Soil cover - -
1.6.3 Soil seed bank or weed seed bank - -
1.6.4 Minimum tillage (mt) - -
1.6.5 Integrated weed management - -
1.6.6 Ecological weed management - -
1.6.7 Hand weeding - -
1.6.8 Hand hoeing - -
1.6.9 Intercropping - -
1.6.10 Mowing - -
1.6.11 Cutting - -
1.6.12 Dredging and chaining - -
1.7 Conceptual framework - -
1.8. Philosophical under pinning of this research - -
Ch 2: Literature review - -
2.0 Introduction - -
2.1 Climate change - -
2.2 Conservation agriculture for sustainability (energy use efficiency and soil health) - -
2.2.1 Relating conservation agriculture with the soil seed bank - -
2.2.2 Crop performance and yield under CA - -
2.2.3 Mechanization of conservation agriculture - -
2.2.4 CA policy and institutional support implications for developing countries - -
2.2.5 Effect of CA on soil health - -
2.2.6. Effect of CA on weeds - -
2.3 Weed ecology - -
2.4 Weed dynamics - -
2.5 Weed management - -
2.5.1 Mechanical and manual weed control - -
2.5.2 Cultural weed control - -
2.5.3 Chemical weed management - -
2.5.4 Preventive weed management - -
2.5.5. Herbicide tolerant crops (HTC) - -
2.5.6 Biological weed control - -
2.6 Integrated weed management in CA - -
2.7. Soil seed banks - -
2.8 Estimation of the soil seed bank - -
2.9.0 Effect of crop management practice on weeds and crop yield - -
2.9.1 Effect of tillage practice on weeds - -
2.9.2 Effect of soil cover on weeds - -
2.9.3 Effect of intercropping on crop yield and performance - -
2.9.4 Yield and weed response to diversified crop rotations - -
2.9.5 Integrated weed management in perspective - -
2.9.6 Conclusion and future prospect of ca for Uganda - -

Chapter three: research methodology - -
3.1 objective 1. To compare three seed bank estimation techniques for detecting treatment
Differences and determining seed density and species composition - -
3.1.1 Introduction - -
3.1.2 Study site - -
3.1.3 Materials - -
3.1.4 Experimental design and layout - -
3.1.5 Data collection - -
3.1.6 Statistical analysis - -
3.2 Objective 2: to determine the effect of tillage practice on weed density, diversity and
Crop performance - -
3.2.1 Materials - -
3.2.2 Methods: experimental design and crop management - -
3.2.3 Data collection - -
3.2.3.1 Weed density - -
3.2.3.2 Weed community - -
3.2.3.3 Leaf area index (lai) and plant height (cm) - -
3.2.3.4 Stand count - -
3.2.3.5 Days to 50% flowering - -
3.2.3.6 plant height - -
3.2.3.7 Pod number - -
3.2.3.8 Pod length - -
3.2.3.9 Disease and pest incidence - -
3.2.3.10 Grain yield - -
3.2.3.11 Rainfall (mm) and daily temperature (OC) - -
3.2.3.12 Data sheet - -
3.2.3.13 Global positioning system receiver (GPS receiver) - -
3.2.14 Statistical analysis - -
3.3 Objective 3: to determine the effect of soil cover on weed density, diversity and crop
Performance - -
3.3.1 Materials - -
3.3.2 Methods: experimental design and crop management - -
3.3.3 Data collection - -
3.3.4 Statistical analysis - -
3.4 Objective 4: to determine the effect of the intercrops on overall crop performance in
Conservation agricultural systems - -
3.4.1 Materials - -
3.4.2 Methods experimental design and crop management - -
3.4.3 Data collection - -
3.4.4 Data analysis - -
3.5 Ethical consideration - -
3.6 Limitation of the study - -
Ch:4 Result Presentations, analysis and discussion of findings - -
4.0 Comparison of three soil seed bank estimation techniques for detecting treatment
differences and determining seed density and species composition - -
4.1.1 Introduction - -
4.1.2 Comparison of the three soil seed bank estimation methods to measure soil seed
bank weed density - -
4.1.2 Comparison of the three soil seed bank estimation methods to measure weed
diversity - -
4.1.3 Effect of tillage and soil cover on soil seed bank - -
4.1.4 Effect of season on soil seed bank density - -
4.1.5 Effect of season on soil seed bank diversity - -
4.1.6 Discussion for the comparison of three soil seed bank estimation techniques for
detecting treatment differences and determining soil seed density and diversity - -
4.1.7 Conclusion - -
4.2 Effect of tillage practice on weed density, diversity and crop performance - -
4.2.1 Introduction - -
4.2.2. Effect of rainfall amount and number of rainy days on weed density and diversity - -
4.2.3 Effect of tillage practice on weed density - -
4.2.4 Effect of tillage practice on weed diversity using shannon weiner index - -
4.2.5 Effect of tillage practice on weed diversity using simpsons diversity index - -
4.2.6 Effect of tillage practice on yield - -
4.2.7 Effect of tillage practice x soil cover practice x season interaction on above ground
weed density - -
4.2.8 Effect of tillage practice x soil cover practice x season interaction on above ground
weed diversity - -
4.2.9 Discussion and conclusion objective 2 - -
4.3 Effect of soil cover practice on weed density, diversity and crop performance - -
4.3.1 Introduction - -
4.3.3 Effect of soil cover practice on above ground weed density - -
4.3.4 Effect of soil cover practice on weed diversity using shannon weiner index - -
4.3.5 Effect of soil cover practice on weed diversity using simpsons diversity index - -
4.3.6 Effect of soil cover practice on yield - -
4.3.7 Discussion objective 3 - -
4.3.8 Conclusion objective 3 - -
4.4 Effect of intercropping on overall crop performance under ca system - -
4.4.1 Introduction - -
4.4.2 Effect of intercropping on maize yield - -
4.4.3 Effect of intercropping on soybean yield - -
4.4.4 Land equivalence ratio (LER) - -
4.4.5 Effect of intercropping on key maize crop growth parameters - -
4.4.6 Discussion - -
4.4.7 Conclusion - -
Ch 5: Implication of the study - -
Ch 6: Conclusion and recommendation - -

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.
Share

Archbishop Kiwanuka Memorial Library | Uganda Martyrs University P.O. Box : 5498 Kampala, Uganda
Tel : +256-(0) 382-277-901 or +256-(0) 382-410-611 / E-mail : library@umu.ac.ug